"The Department disagrees with this decision and will appeal in due course," a Justice Department spokesperson said in a statement.
Author of the article:

See more Toronto Sun on Google — save as a Preferred Source
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
- Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account.
- Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on.
- Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists.
- Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists.
- Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
- Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account.
- Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on.
- Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists.
- Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists.
- Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
- Access articles from across Canada with one account.
- Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
- Enjoy additional articles per month.
- Get email updates from your favourite authors.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
- Access articles from across Canada with one account
- Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments
- Enjoy additional articles per month
- Get email updates from your favourite authors
A federal judge in New York ruled Monday that the Justice Department unlawfully fired Maurene Comey, daughter of former FBI director James B. Comey, from her job as a federal prosecutor.
Comey had argued in her federal lawsuit that she was fired because of her father, whom President Donald Trump fired as head of the FBI during his first term, and because of her perceived political beliefs. The Trump administration has brought federal charges against her father, who became a prominent critic of the president after he was fired.
The Justice Department countered that Comey, as a federal prosecutor in New York, was an executive branch employee whom the president has the broad authority to terminate.
But on Monday, U.S. District Judge Jesse M. Furman in the Southern District of New York ruled that the Justice Department was wrong and wrote that the government’s defence of her firing “flies in the face of nearly two centuries of Supreme Court precedent.”
Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond.
By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.
A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.
The next issue of Your Midday Sun will soon be in your inbox.
We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again
“Indeed, to accept Defendants’ argument would be to unsettle the very equilibrium established by this Nation’s constitutional system,” Furman, who was appointed by President Barack Obama, wrote in his 55-page opinion.
Comey is one of the scores of career employees whom the Justice Department has fired during Trump’s second term, often with no explanation beyond citing the president’s powers under the Constitution. She had worked as a federal prosecutor handling high-profile cases, including those brought against sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and Sean “Diddy” Combs, the music mogul.
Career government employees are generally afforded broad protections to ensure that they are not fired for political reasons and that their employment can span Republican and Democratic presidential administrations.
Many of the employees dismissed during the Trump administration have challenged their firings either in federal or administrative courts.
Comey’s lawsuit is widely viewed as a litmus test to see whether similar cases survive in federal court, or whether they may be sent to the Merit Systems Protection Board, the administrative body that deals with federal government firings and demotions.
Furman ordered that Justice Department retroactively reinstate Comey and provide her back pay from when she was fired in July 2025 until she took another job at a private law firm in December of the same year.
“The Department disagrees with this decision and will appeal in due course,” a Justice Department spokesperson said in a statement.
Furman noted in his opinion that Comey was assigned some of the Justice Department’s most prominent cases and consistently received high accolades from her supervisors and peers.
But she was fired on July 16, 2025, shortly after the conclusion of Combs’s trial in U.S. District Court in Manhattan.
According to her lawsuit, she was not provided a reason for her termination. When Comey asked why she was fired, her lawsuit states, Jay Clayton, then the interim U.S. attorney in Manhattan, said: “All I can say is it came from Washington. I can’t tell you anything else.”
Clayton has since left that office and was confirmed this summer as the director of national intelligence.
The firing of Comey came as the Trump administration was frequently targeting her father through the president’s public statements and Justice Department investigations.
Federal prosecutors in April indicted the elder Comey on allegations that a photo he posted on social media in 2025 constituted a dangerous threat to the president.
In a separate case, the Justice Department in September 2025 indicted Comey in the Eastern District of Virginia on two counts alleging that he lied to Congress. The grand jury in Virginia rejected a third count sought by government prosecutors involving another alleged false statement.
That case had been thrown out by a judge who concluded that the U.S. attorney who secured the indictment, along with another against New York Attorney General Letitia James (D), was unlawfully serving in the role. The Justice Department has sought to revive both cases.
Join the Conversation
This website uses cookies to personalize your content (including ads), and allows us to analyze our traffic. Read more about cookies here. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.





