ECI Backs CEC Gyanesh Kumar in Supreme Court, Denies Unilateral Decisions and Form 6 Amendments
In an affidavit submitted to the Supreme Court, the Election Commission of India has refuted allegations of unilateral decision-making by Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. Responding to petitions questioning administrative processes, the poll panel stated that all decisions concerning the Special Intensive Revision of Electoral Rolls orders were made unanimously by all three commission members, including Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi. The commission affirmed that Form 6 has not been amended, explaining that the declaration added was an annexure intended to facilitate voter mapping and prevent repetitive documentation cycles, as experienced during the Bihar revision. The Election Commission further maintained that no voter names can be added or deleted without an order from the Electoral Registration Officer. Addressing concerns over operational transparency, the poll body stated that an expert panel comprising members from IIT and the Indian Institute of Science has been constituted to oversee compliance with established rules.
Delhi Riots Accused Sharjeel Imam, Umar Khalid Face UAPA as Constitution Row Sparks Debate
Sharjeel Imam and Umar Khalid, who stand accused in a larger conspiracy case linked to the 2020 Delhi riots, remain under scrutiny as their bail pleas continue to face legal hurdles. Both face serious charges under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and sections of the Indian Penal Code, including criminal conspiracy and rioting offenses. The controversy around Sharjeel Imam has resurfaced over his ideology regarding the Constitution of India, which he reportedly argued denies Muslims adequate representation and acts as a roadblock to their dignified existence. The report also revisits Imam's January 2020 speech at Aligarh Muslim University, where he spoke about cutting off India's Northeast at the strategic Chicken's Neck area.
Political Discourse: 'Insulting Modi Gives Them Some Kind Of Satisfaction', Says Rohan Gupta
A heated debate erupted over the deteriorating standard of language and political public discourse in India following controversial remarks by Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge. BJP National Spokesperson Rohan Gupta criticised the Congress leadership, asserting that making personal comments and insulting Prime Minister Narendra Modi has become part of the party's regular functioning whenever they face political frustration. Gupta insisted that while personal attacks should not be tolerated regardless of who makes them, Congress leaders repeatedly cross acceptable limits. In response, Congress Spokesperson Rahul Singh Kalija defended Kharge's statements, maintaining that the BJP set the hostile political template and arguing that the party would give replies in kind. Political analysts Rajat Sethi and Ashutosh examined the broader political fallout, debating whether personal insults actually sway elections or simply reflect deep polarisation across the political divide.
Trump Stirs Row Over Nicki Minaj Remark, Rekindles Past Comments | To The Point
A remark by US President Donald Trump regarding rapper Nicki Minaj's appearance during an on-stage event has triggered widespread public controversy and online debate. Minaj, an outspoken supporter of Trump, joined him on stage before the comments led to a flurry of internet memes, jokes about the White House press secretary role, and intense criticism regarding decorum and appropriateness. The episode has brought renewed attention to Trump's history of controversial remarks concerning women's appearances, including past references to former press secretary Karoline Leavitt and his wife, Melania Trump. The report examines the growing public debate over where political humour ends and disrespect begins.