More than 14 years after the murders of journalist couple Sagar Sarowar and Meherun Runi, the investigation remains incomplete. Despite repeated court deadlines, changes in investigating agencies and the formation of a high-level task force, the case has yet to reach a conclusion.
The task force recently sought more time from the High Court to submit its investigation report, saying it was still verifying information gathered from different sources.
The prolonged investigation has become one of the most prominent examples of the difficulties victims’ families face in obtaining timely justice in Bangladesh.
But the Sagar-Runi case is far from the only example. From the murder of college student Sohagi Jahan Tonu to the Rana Plaza collapse and the Bangladesh Bank reserve heist, several high-profile cases have remained unresolved for years, raising questions about investigative capacity, prosecution and judicial efficiency.
A decade without answers
Tonu, a student of Cumilla Victoria Government College and a theatre activist, was raped and murdered inside Cumilla Cantonment on March 20, 2016. Ten years later, the case remains unresolved, with no trial having taken place.
78 hearing dates had passed, while six investigators from four agencies had handled the case. Investigators had yet to make an arrest at the time of the report.
The investigation has involved multiple agencies, including the Criminal Investigation Department and the Police Bureau of Investigation. DNA testing confirmed that Tonu had been raped, but investigators had not identified those responsible for her death.
Her family has repeatedly sought progress in the investigation, while the case continues to highlight the consequences of prolonged investigations in serious crimes.
Another long-running case is the murder of Tanvir Muhammad Taqi, a teenager from Narayanganj who was killed in March 2013. The case has remained unresolved for years despite repeated demands from his family for accountability. Alongside the Sagar-Runi and Tonu cases, it has become part of a wider pattern of high-profile murder investigations that have failed to reach timely conclusions.
Rana Plaza
The Rana Plaza collapse in Savar on April 24, 2013, killed at least 1,136 people and injured thousands more. Thirteen years later, major criminal proceedings over the disaster remain unfinished.
In the murder case against 41 accused, including building owner Sohel Rana, testimony had been recorded from only 145 of the 594 listed witnesses by April 2026. Proceedings in a separate case over building-code violations had yet to advance to witness testimony.
The prosecution has attributed delays partly to the repeated absence of witnesses despite court summonses. The slow proceedings have prolonged uncertainty for victims’ families and survivors seeking accountability for the disaster.
The Rana Plaza cases demonstrate that even when charges have been framed and trials have begun, the process can take years to reach a conclusion.
Delays in major financial-crime investigations
The Bangladesh Bank reserve heist case provides another example of prolonged investigations.
In February 2016, hackers stole $81 million from Bangladesh Bank’s account at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The investigation in Bangladesh has continued for years, with repeated extensions for submitting the probe report.
The court had deferred submission of the investigation report for the 95th time. The Criminal Investigation Department maintained that the investigation was ongoing and rejected reports that it had finalised a draft charge sheet.
The case illustrates how investigations into complex financial crimes can remain unfinished long after the original incident, leaving questions about responsibility and accountability unresolved.
Munia case raises questions over accountability
The death of college student Mosarat Jahan Munia in Dhaka in April 2021 also drew widespread public attention and legal controversy.
Her death prompted a criminal case and subsequent proceedings, while her family challenged aspects of the investigation. The case has been cited alongside the Sagar-Runi, Tonu and Taqi cases in reporting on families who remain dissatisfied with the outcomes of high-profile investigations.
The case also underscores the importance of distinguishing between the conclusion of an investigation, a family’s challenge to that conclusion and a final judicial determination.
The cost of prolonged justice
These cases illustrate different stages at which the justice process can stall. Investigators may fail to identify suspects or complete reports, prosecutors may struggle to produce witnesses, and trials may take years to reach a verdict.
For victims’ families, the consequences can include repeated court appearances, financial burdens and prolonged uncertainty. Delays can also weaken public confidence in the institutions responsible for investigating crimes and ensuring accountability.
However, the reasons for delay differ across cases. The absence of witnesses, complex evidence, investigative shortcomings and procedural disputes can all contribute to prolonged proceedings. Each case therefore requires a careful examination of its own circumstances.
The principle that “justice delayed is justice denied” does not mean that cases should be rushed at the expense of a fair trial. Accused persons are entitled to due process, and courts must assess evidence impartially.
But timely justice is also essential. When investigations remain unfinished for years and trials fail to progress, legal remedies risk losing their practical value for those seeking accountability.
The challenge for Bangladesh is to ensure that serious crimes are investigated professionally, prosecutors can present cases effectively and courts can resolve disputes without unnecessary delay.
For families who have spent years waiting for answers, justice must mean more than repeated assurances that a case remains under investigation.