Early in her reign, Queen Elizabeth I—sensing her court was teeming with doubters and double-crossers—made it clear she’d cede her power to no husband. This also meant, of course, she would not produce an heir, which must have turned her bloodline-crazed dad, Henry VIII, in his tomb.

Elizabeth I, Queen of England and Ireland, 1588. Version of the Armada portrait attributed to George Gower.
Wikimedia CommonsWhat’s more, she refused to name a successor. “Assuredly, if my successor were known to the world, I would never esteem my state to be safe,” she told parliament in 1559. Into this vacuum stepped an array of noble sons and daughters with even the flimsiest claim to the throne. “In the 1590s, there were at times as many as a dozen viable contenders to succeed Elizabeth I,” said Elizabeth Goldring, art historian and author of Nicholas Hilliard: Life of an Artist.
In 2024 Goldring, along with Emma Rutherford, who runs The Limner Company, a portrait miniature consultancy, discovered a long lost miniature of one such claimant to the throne: 16-year-old Lady Arbella Stuart, great-great-granddaughter of Henry VII, the first Tudor king, and niece of the doomed Mary Queen of Scots. Described by her first cousin (twice removed) Elizabeth I as “an eaglet of her own kind,” and by the Venetian ambassador as having “very exalted ideas,” Arbella was at times favored above the Queen’s eventual Scottish successor, James I. “Arbella is one of the greatest ‘might haves’ of history,” said Rutherford.
The rediscovery of this long-forgotten portrait, which sold earlier this year, pushes Arbella’s almost-unbelievable story back to the forefront of Tudor and Elizabethan history, an age littered with tales of highborn daughters moving about like pawns on a chessboard, but few got as close to the throne as Arbella.
_(probably)_-_Elizabeth_Hardwick_(1520%25E2%2580%25931608)%2C_Countess_of_Shrewsbury%2C_'Bess_of_Hardwick'_-_1129102_-_National_Trust.jpg)
Elizabeth Hardwick, Countess of Shrewsbury, “Bess of Hardwick,” 1520–1608.
Wikimedia CommonsRaised in gilded captivity by her dynastically inclined grandmother, Bess of Hardwick, who described Arbella as her “jewel” (to be prized, polished and hidden away), Arbella grew up isolated and believing she’d be queen, much like Queen Victoria centuries later. Unlike Victoria, that never happened. Such exalted notions can’t be good for the teenage psyche (she would suffer from fragile, and at times dangerously unstable, mental health for the rest of her life.)
In the spring of 2023, Rutherford was contacted by the then-owner of the miniature to see if she could identify the sitter. She brought in Goldring, who had written a book on the miniature’s painter, Nicholas Hilliard. “Emma and I ended up researching the miniature together for the next twelve months and having a whale of a time on what turned out to be an incredible journey of discovery,” said Goldring.
There were hints. “After almost thirty years of looking at portrait miniatures it takes a lot to make my heart beat faster,” said Rutherford. “I had never seen anything like it…there were so many clues in the painting which could help us identify the sitter.”
Bess of Hardwick was a meticulous keeper of household expenses, so Rutherford and Goldring were able to trace a payment to England’s premier portrait miniaturist of the time, Hilliard, as well as tips paid to Elizabeth I’s gardeners at Greenwich Palace, where the portrait was painted. They were also aware Hilliard had painted Arbella in the early 1590s, “albeit the conventional wisdom was that the resulting portrait was no longer extant,” said Goldring. “It seemed almost too good to be true that we could have found Hilliard’s portrait of her...But the deeper we dug in the archives, the more evidence we found relating to this commission, all of which pointed to the sitter being Arbella.”
Forgotten for centuries and likely tucked away at the back of a drawer or cupboard, the watercolor portrait was “remarkably fresh and vibrant”, said Goldring. As Rutherford recalls, “it was unglazed and unframed and loosely held in a Victorian leather case. One sneeze could have obliterated something that had survived for over 400 years virtually untouched.”
_by_Marcus_Gheeraerts_the_YoungerFXD.jpg)
Queen Elizabeth I, “The Ditchley portrait” by Marcus Gheeraerts, 1592.
Wikimedia CommonsThough small in size, the portrait tells a story of soaring ambitions. In the summer of 1592, Grandma Bess hired Hilliard to paint Arbella standing in the flowering gardens of Greenwich Palace dressed in the impossibly-high-ruffed dress of a queen, and making what Goldring realized was a preposterously bold allusion to the famous “Ditchley portrait” of Elizabeth I from the same year (now hanging in the National Portrait Gallery in London).
“This was a miniature designed to present Arbella as, among other things, a Queen-in-waiting, another Elizabeth I, but younger and still of child-bearing age,” said Goldring. “Note all the images of fertility and fruitfulness in that garden.”
Small and therefore easy to transport, portrait miniatures such as these were designed to be used in dynastic marriage negotiations between Europe’s royal courts and powerful families. But as Goldring and Rutherword would discover, this particular miniature was more than just a pretty picture of a would-be bride.
“One of the most extraordinary things Emma and I discovered was that Hilliard’s miniature of Arbella was, at one stage, intended for use by the Elizabethan spy services as a prop in a plot to wrong-foot Philip II of Spain,” said Goldring. By leading Philip into believing Arbella was marrying the son of his ally, the Duke of Parma, Protestant England could drive a wedge between two Continental Catholic powers.
“Arbella stands with the world at her feet: She is presented as royal, she is poised to marry into an alliance which will be for England’s good, but she is about to lose it all,” said Rutherford. In the end the marriage plot fell through and the portrait never made it to the continent. Tucked away and forgotten for centuries, it served as a woebegotten metaphor for Arbella’s life.
“When she failed to fulfill her one role in life to become queen, and then her grandmother died a few years later, she rebelled on a grand scale,” said Rutherford. In her 30s Arbella made a last ditch grab for power—or simply agency—when she married William Seymour (another former claimant to the throne) in secret. Word of the marriage reached the top, as it always does (Will these courtiers never learn?) and Arbella’s former rival for the crown, now King James I, had the couple locked up, separately.
Arbella escaped, disguised as a man in a wig, boots and sword, with plans to flee to France with her ill-begotten husband. Seymour made it to safety and prospered like a man. She was caught and sent to the Tower. In a tragically poetic twist of fate, she died in 1615 following a hunger strike in what were likely the former Tower lodgings of her forebear, Anne Boleyn, that other dynastic pawn-turned-power player of the Tudor age.
“I think that this portrait has gone a long way to reviving an interest in Arbella. It has humanized someone who was previously just a footnote in history and fleshed out her story in a way that perhaps no other artefact might have done,” said Rutherford. “And everyone loves a new discovery.”
A new Theory in an 84 Year-Old Royal Mystery About Prince George, Duke of Kent
A Close-Up Look at Some of the Most Spectacular Royal Fashion Plates
